The controversy about whether photography is art is one that has been raging within the art world for a long time and that we aren't prone to totally solve it here. But it can be an essential decision you have to make if you are work in photography using the goal of producing quality art works. If that's where you stand, the concept that someone would say “That’s not art, you just took a picture” is fairly disturbing. So it’s worth exploring the question from several different angles before we pick which side to weigh in on.
Of course, art is a subjective thing. Many people would take a look at a Jackson Pollack “splatter” art work and determine most surely that modern art is not art because it “doesn’t look like anything.” And should you spend whenever in the modern art world, you will definitely see something at some time along the way occupying space in a perfectly respectable art museum that, for you, could never be considered art.
Same with it just a matter of opinion? To some degree, yes. But there is an art world and an industry behind it that depend on there being some standards where art is judged. One such standard may be the intent from the artist. If you produce an image or an art work derived from a photograph that'sintended to be viewed as art, then the viewer is obligated to try and see the artistic merit inside it. Whether the viewer sees that merit or not may rely on the viewer’s abilities, how good you are at getting your artistic message across or many other factors.
But just wanting something to become art doesn’t allow it to be art will it? As a layman within the art world, I sometimes opt for the “I don’t know art but I understand what I like” system of evaluating pieces . Art, in the end, has a tendency to touch us in another place that's far above the image. It is definitely an emotional place, a place of reflection and understanding. Maybe we would say it touches our “soul”. For a piece to become art, there should be a note, a sense, a reason the artist made the job while he or she desired to say something, even when how I interpret the statement differs fromwhat are the artist meant.
To ensure that might also be an evaluation of a photograph regarding its artistic merit or not. Now the main objection to whether photography is art sometimes is the fact that an image is usually a realistic depiction of a moment taken with a machine and some would say that “anybody may take a picture.” The implication would be that the same mechanical skill it could take to color an image of sculpt a statue isn't needed for photographic art.
It’s correct that the mechanical skill the guy at Wal-Mart might need to consider baby pictures could be the just like an excellent photographic artist might need. But the objection doesn’t endure because theis used to produce great poetry as it takes yell out obscenities in a baseball game. So it isn’t the skill which makes it art.
Good evidence comes from the credit some great art experts have given to photographic exhibitions in the fine museums on the planet. The very fact that photography is recognized as art by people whomight be evidence enough. So the final outcome should be that since the arguments from thevalue of photographs are weak and people who know consider photography to be art, then we are safe in viewing what we should do artistically too. And that reveals that side of the soul to expressthrough the medium you love the most - photography. same human language know artistic yourself
Of course, art is a subjective thing. Many people would take a look at a Jackson Pollack “splatter” art work and determine most surely that modern art is not art because it “doesn’t look like anything.” And should you spend whenever in the modern art world, you will definitely see something at some time along the way occupying space in a perfectly respectable art museum that, for you, could never be considered art.
Same with it just a matter of opinion? To some degree, yes. But there is an art world and an industry behind it that depend on there being some standards where art is judged. One such standard may be the intent from the artist. If you produce an image or an art work derived from a photograph that'sintended to be viewed as art, then the viewer is obligated to try and see the artistic merit inside it. Whether the viewer sees that merit or not may rely on the viewer’s abilities, how good you are at getting your artistic message across or many other factors.
But just wanting something to become art doesn’t allow it to be art will it? As a layman within the art world, I sometimes opt for the “I don’t know art but I understand what I like” system of evaluating pieces . Art, in the end, has a tendency to touch us in another place that's far above the image. It is definitely an emotional place, a place of reflection and understanding. Maybe we would say it touches our “soul”. For a piece to become art, there should be a note, a sense, a reason the artist made the job while he or she desired to say something, even when how I interpret the statement differs fromwhat are the artist meant.
To ensure that might also be an evaluation of a photograph regarding its artistic merit or not. Now the main objection to whether photography is art sometimes is the fact that an image is usually a realistic depiction of a moment taken with a machine and some would say that “anybody may take a picture.” The implication would be that the same mechanical skill it could take to color an image of sculpt a statue isn't needed for photographic art.
It’s correct that the mechanical skill the guy at Wal-Mart might need to consider baby pictures could be the just like an excellent photographic artist might need. But the objection doesn’t endure because theis used to produce great poetry as it takes yell out obscenities in a baseball game. So it isn’t the skill which makes it art.
Good evidence comes from the credit some great art experts have given to photographic exhibitions in the fine museums on the planet. The very fact that photography is recognized as art by people whomight be evidence enough. So the final outcome should be that since the arguments from thevalue of photographs are weak and people who know consider photography to be art, then we are safe in viewing what we should do artistically too. And that reveals that side of the soul to expressthrough the medium you love the most - photography. same human language know artistic yourself
